About the Author(s)


Gian Lippi Email
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Citation


Lippi G. Schizophrenia in a member of the family: Burden, expressed emotion and addressing the needs of the whole family. S Afr J Psychiat. 2016;22(1), a922. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v22i1.922

Original Research

Schizophrenia in a member of the family: Burden, expressed emotion and addressing the needs of the whole family

Gian Lippi

Received: 15 Dec. 2015; Accepted: 07 July 2016; Published: 31 Aug. 2016

Copyright: © 2016. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

How often do we find ourselves concentrating so much on treating a patient with schizophrenia that we forget about the needs and difficulties of the family members who take care of that patient? This article highlights the global and specific difficulties that families and caregivers experience in having to care for chronically ill family members with schizophrenia with a backdrop of continuing global deinstitutionalisation of such patients. Matters such as burden and expressed emotion are explored, family-specific interventions are discussed and areas of service delivery and resource inadequacies are identified.

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a psychiatric disorder, which is characterised by slow functional deterioration and episodes of relapse or acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms. The mean age of onset in early adulthood, deterioration in patients’ activities of daily living and ability to sustain employment, and the propensity of the disorder to affect insight leave many patients requiring assistance and care for an extended period of time.

At the same time, the global push for the deinstitutionalisation of these patients has resulted in an increase in responsibility for care to be supplied by the family and its members.1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Unfortunately, there is also evidence worldwide that this policy of deinstitutionalisation, and the rate thereof, has not been matched by a sufficient increase in community mental health resources everywhere, that is, resources that can assist both patient and family. This is especially true in developing countries where insufficient financing severely restricts the development of these community resources. In essence, governments worldwide are entrusting the long-term care of their patients with schizophrenia to family members. The question is, ‘how much do these family members know about the disorder or how to manage people who suffer from it?’ Are they equipped for the task? The literature suggests that they are uninformed and ill-equipped.6,8 In this context, studying the impact of caregiving on these families therefore becomes especially relevant.9

Caregivers of patients with childhood onset chronic psychiatric disorders such as autism spectrum disorders, who are usually the parents, realise at an early stage that there will be a responsibility for them to care for their child for the rest of their lives in most cases. They therefore tend to adapt accordingly as the child grows up and experience a comparatively slow change to their lives and expectations regarding their ill child.

On the other hand, major neurocognitive disorders tend to affect the elderly. There is therefore a sudden responsibility thrust upon carers (in this case, mostly spouses or children) that requires a dramatic adjustment to their lives; however, because of the life expectancy associated with illnesses that present with the disorder, it is a comparatively short-term responsibility.

Patients with schizophrenia can often have a normal childhood and adolescence before suddenly, unexpectedly and often dramatically becoming ill. Because of the age of onset, care responsibilities are suddenly thrust upon mostly parents, even before they have come to terms with the shock of the sudden, dramatic onset of the illness. It often comes at a time when they would expect their child to gain independence and when they themselves are at an age when retirement could have been considered. The lowering of expectation for the future of their child, along with the new, long-term care responsibilities, tends to weigh heavily on these parents, requiring a dramatic adjustment to their lives and subjecting them to unique symptoms and behaviours, which become increasingly difficult to manage, especially for people of their age. Resultant negative effects on the family are not surprising.

There has been research into the problems these families face, especially in the context of continuing deinstitutionalisation. Before these families can be helped, one needs to first identify and understand the problems they experience.

The concept of burden

Caring for family members with schizophrenia subjects caregivers to mostly negative experiences, which in turn negatively impact the caregivers themselves. Table 1, ‘second column, provides information and examples of how caring for family members with schizophrenia can negatively impact the caregivers themselves. These negative aspects experienced by patients’ relatives as a consequence of their caregiving role are collectively known as ‘burden’.10 Attempts have been made in the literature to better define ‘burden’ as the existence of serious psychosocial and emotional problems, difficulties or negative events,4 stressful situations or significant life changes that influence the family member of an ill relative.11 It has also been defined as the extent to which caregivers perceive their emotional and physical health, social life and financial status as suffering as a result of caring for a relative.12

TABLE 1: Examples of objective and subjective burden as experienced, and described, by family members or caregivers.

Burden can be classified according to the affected party. For example, family burden is the burden experienced by the family as a unit,12,13 while individual burden is experienced by a single caregiver or individual member of a family.

Burden is not only the objective demands associated with caring but also the caregivers’ subjective reaction to them.14 Reference is therefore made to objective burden being the practical problems, difficulties and concrete and observable negative effects the illness has on family life resulting in significant life changes.10,12,15,16,17,18 On the other hand, subjective burden is the extent to which caregivers actually feel burdened because of the situation,16 resulting in psychological reactions and affecting well-being.10,12,15,16,17,18

For examples of objective and subjective burden experienced, and described, by family members or caregivers, see Table 1.

Objective and subjective burdens have a direct influence on each other. For example, decreased participation in social activities as a result of having to spend many hours caring for an ill relative can lead to increased depressive symptoms, which, in turn, can lead to a decreased drive to participate in social activities.

Research has revealed that family members caring for relatives with schizophrenia experienced significantly higher levels of objective and subjective burden than those caring for relatives with chronic physical illnesses or other chronic psychiatric disorders such as depressive disorders, bipolar disorders and obsessive–compulsive disorder.4,10,17 Severe objective and subjective burdens increase the global burden experienced. Parents of patients with severe and permanent psychosocial functional impairments have been shown to have a constantly high level of global burden.16

Many factors have been identified which can either increase or decrease the severity of burden experienced (Table 2).

TABLE 2: Factors influencing burden.

Caregivers rarely voice the burden experienced,19 resulting in professionals often not being fully aware of the negative impact of caring for a mentally ill relative on caregivers. As this burden has now been intensively researched and is better understood, awareness will increase and these family members should receive the help they deserve in an attempt to decrease the burden experienced.

The influence of expressed emotion on schizophrenia

Expressed emotion (EE) can be interpreted as a complex pattern of interaction between the patient and his or her family that at the same time represents the general conditions and consequences of the mental illness.16

It changes over time and is influenced by circumstance – it decreases after a patient is discharged from hospital and then slowly increases again.33 EE is measured through five variables that reflect carer attitude: hostility, critical comments, positive comments, emotional over involvement (EOI) and warmth.34

These variables collectively, but not individually, influence relapse rates.29 Families that tend to be hostile, critical and emotionally overinvolved are said to be high expressed emotion (HEE) families,3,19,29,35 while families that tend to be positive, empathetic, calm and respectful, with low levels of emotion, are said to be low expressed emotion (LEE) families.19 Families with HEE tend to believe that the symptoms can somehow be controlled by the patient35

Warmth, previously seen as an attribute of LEE, has been found to be an unreliable variable of EE because high levels of warmth (which is positive) are accompanied by EOI, while low levels of warmth are accompanied by an increase in critical comments – EOI and criticism both being variables in HEE (which is negative).35

EE is a transcultural phenomenon and a very reliable predictor of relapse in schizophrenia.3 HEE is the third most common cause of relapse behind non-adherence with medication and drug abuse with 50% of patients discharged back to HEE families soon relapsing compared to a 21% relapse rate after discharge back to an LEE family.35

Another negative finding is that levels of EE are highly resistant to change, with short educational interventions having no influence on levels of EE or EOI.6 HEE is especially resistant, with intensive interventions required to decrease levels of EE, even then it is often unsuccessful. Recent evidence does, however, indicate that although levels of EE can temporarily decrease with intervention, the levels return to the prior levels of HEE within 3 years, probably coinciding with a decrease in the level of functioning of the patient. There is contradictory opinion as to whether interventions have any effect on EE.3,33 However, proper family psycho-education not only on the illness but also on the subject of EE is essential. Advice on the need to discontinue practices that lead to HEE and EOI – such as criticism of the patient (for instance, for ‘being lazy and sitting around doing nothing’ when in fact he/she experiences negative symptoms of schizophrenia) and intrusiveness (through invasion of the patient’s privacy and emotional and symptomatic probing) – should be given to families.

Inadequacies in resources and service delivery

Mental health care resources and levels of service delivery vary greatly worldwide; yet there are definite similarities in the experiences of family members of mentally ill patients dependent on mental health care service. Negative experiences and complaints are in all likelihood highly subjective and generalised. However, whether or not these complaints are fair is another point of discussion. They merit our attention if we wish to succeed in our quest of helping these families. Table 3 presents common complaints about resources, service delivery and mental health care professionals.

TABLE 3: Common complaints by families and caregivers about resources, service delivery and mental health care professionals.

Most families of patients with schizophrenia believe that they received inadequate information regarding the illness of their relative,19,20,21,25,27,36 early warning signs of relapse, effects of medication and ways of coping with bizarre and violent behaviour.8

Another complaint is that the police do not know enough about mental illness, are badly trained and make fun of patients.27

It is a poor reflection of service delivery when the families believe that they receive more support and information about mental illness from self-help groups than from mental health care professionals.22 It has also been proved that the lack of community mental health resource centres and perceived support from mental health care departments increase levels of burden experienced by families of patients with schizophrenia.19 In most areas of South Africa, there is currently a distinct lack of community resources to deliver services that can contribute positively to the lives of these families.

Concepts for addressing the needs of these families

There are difficulties experienced by patients with schizophrenia and caregivers and families which are shared, but there are also difficulties which are unique to each. The difficulties are complex, and it is suggested that they should be addressed both individually where appropriate and together where possible. One can thereby categorise the focus of service delivery into the following sections:

  1. Helping the patients

  2. Helping the families to help the patients

  3. Helping both the patients and the families

  4. Helping the families.

Helping the patients

As discussed above, by increasing the levels of psychosocial functioning and decreasing hospitalisations, psychotic and negative symptoms of the patient, levels of family burden are also decreased. Optimal treatment focussed on minimizing and controlling symptoms by optimizing medication should be strived for. Psychosocial and psychotherapeutic interventions directed at improving insight and levels of functioning are equally important. Thus, by helping the patients, the families are helped indirectly.13

Helping the families to help the patients

Families require advice surrounding how best to care for their ill relative and positively contribute towards maintaining his or her good mental health. Providing families with sufficient information about the disorder,10,37 early symptoms and signs of relapse and side-effects of prescribed medication, as well as ways to deal with bizarre and violent behaviour and various strategies for patient management at home is therefore essential.37 One of the most important contributions that families can make to the well-being of their ill relative is to lower the levels of EE within the family, the concept of which is discussed above. Families require detailed information about EE and how it influences the mental state of patients with schizophrenia so that they can make necessary adjustments and positively influence the mental state of their relative. Interventions aimed at helping these family members directly can also assist them with helping the patient.

Helping both the patients and the families

Successful treatment of the patients and implementing specific interventions for both patients and families go a long way in benefiting both parties. A lot of what can be done to assist both patients and families are practical in nature and involve resources that are not only visible but also tangible in other ways. In the literature, there are practical means of helping both patients and families (see Box 1). Some of the resources mentioned do exist in certain areas locally (but small in numbers), but are distinctly lacking in other areas. Other elements from Box 1 may exist but are not necessarily implemented as optimally as would have been originally envisioned.

BOX 1: Practical ways of helping both the patients and the families.
Helping the families

In order to help the family members directly, they have to be seen as index patients themselves and be offered therapies and interventions aimed directly at improving their well-being when necessary. Addressing their worries, fears and symptoms of depression and anxiety, which develop as a result of caring for mentally ill relatives, may require situation-specific therapeutic input. Providing family member caregivers with higher levels of support, attempting to increase their levels of optimism and including them in the treatment process of their ill relatives are vital elements that need attention in order to positively influence the long-term mental health of these people.

Specific interventions and programmes aimed at addressing the needs of families and empowering them with relevant information and skills have been well researched and implemented in selected areas worldwide. Some of these are outlined in the next section.

Interventions and programmes

Apart from specific rehabilitation programmes for patients, which result in fewer health and economic problems and decreased family burden and disruption of social lives of caregivers,15 there are examples of interventions and programmes that consist of different combinations of strategies aimed at family members of patients with schizophrenia. There is evidence of their efficacy, but they are not always being readily implemented.10,20,25

Interventions and programmes are built around psycho-education (PE) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and involve elements such as problem-solving and coping strategies.10,28 Religious coping is an interesting form of coping that can be implemented in interventions as it has been shown to decrease burden. Believers indicate that feeling that a ‘Creator’ was in control decreased the level of distress and increased their hope for the future.28 Interventions need to be implemented early; otherwise, relatives will develop fixed views that might be difficult to change.6

PE is focussed on providing patients and families with information about early signs of relapse and effects of medication. Research indicates that families tend to not find the information too complicated to understand.22

CBT is aimed at increasing optimism. Some programmes with the most robust evidence for efficacy are outlined below.

Psychoeducational interventions
  • Various models exist, including the Support and Family Education Programme.36 Not all are diagnosis specific.
  • Aims:
    1. To reduce relapse rates by providing skills training in problem-solving, communication and coping skills25

    2. To share information about the disorder, its course, early warning signs and relapse prevention25,36
    3. To give families opportunities to ask questions about psychiatric disorders and treatment options36
    4. To help families understand the importance of early intervention36
    5. To change the families’ level of EE6
    6. To publicise the availability of mental health services36
    7. To reduce the stigma of mental illness.36

  • Group interventions consist of the following:
    1. Provision of new information – presentations are given and families are provided with newsletters, pamphlets, lists of resources and websites, and may borrow books and videos (relatives tend to find videos the most informative and presentations more informative than the literature).6,25,36

    2. Group discussions and sharing of experiences.6,25,36
    3. Question and answer sessions.25,36

  • Individual family sessions are also provided and they consist of behavioural family therapy (BFT).
  • The programmes usually consist of 12 or more sessions of 90 minutes each over 6 months to 2 years.25,36
  • Results:
    1. Increased knowledge about schizophrenia26

    2. Increased satisfaction with health care services6
    3. Increased use of coping behaviours6
    4. Increased optimism6
    5. Reduced anxiety, stress and distress6
    6. Improved patient medication adherence38
    7. Reduced patient relapse and admission rates25,38
    8. Reduced family burden13,25,29
    9. No change in levels of EE or EOI.6

Peer-led family support and psycho-education
  • An example of a programme with an evidence base for efficacy from randomised controlled trials is the National Alliance on Mental Illness’s Family-to-Family Program.7
  • The aims of this programme and other similar programmes are to help families get information, access support and services, improve coping skills, engage in self-care, improve communication, increase empathy, solve problems and understand research that promotes recovery.7
  • The concept surrounds the utilising of individuals who have experience living with illnesses such as schizophrenia for coaching, mentoring, teaching, coping and advocacy guidance (a model not dissimilar to that of substance abuse recovery).7
  • It consists of the following:
    1. A 12-week skill-building course taught by family members (who receive specific training to lead and facilitate sessions) for family members.7

    2. Sessions of two and a half hours each (up to 14 sessions).38

  • Results:
    1. Improvements in knowledge and both emotional and problem-focussed coping7

    2. Improved problem-solving and reduced distress and subjective burden25,38
    3. Improved family coping38
    4. Improved overall functioning of the patient (including self-maintenance, social functioning and community living skills) and decreased number and durations of hospitalisations.38

Behavioural family therapy
  • It is a family psycho-educative intervention which addresses stress management and goal achievement.34
  • Positive results include decreased family burden, relapses and dosages of neuroleptics taken by patients. It also decreases feelings of resignation and increases optimism in caring for the patient. Families gain coping strategies and independence.34
Multiple family group therapy
  • It is a combination of BFT and formal PE which also concentrates on problem-solving.14,30
  • It aims to have a positive effect on patient outcome by decreasing symptoms and relapse rates and increasing social and vocational skills.14,30
  • The group consists of two clinicians and eight families.14,30
  • The programme consists of four phases as follows:
    1. the joining phase

    2. a 1-day PE workshop
    3. a year of fortnightly sessions focussing on relapse prevention
    4. a year of monthly sessions focussing on social and vocational rehabilitation.14,30

  • Results include reduced negative symptoms and hospitalisations, but it is not primarily aimed at or proven to decrease burden.14,30
Family interventions
  • These interventions explore solutions to help families effectively deal with difficulties that occur secondary to illness, and promote understanding of psychosis with the goal of improving patient social functioning and independence.20,34
  • Aims:
    1. To instil hope by focussing on recovery20,34

    2. To provide education and information20,34
    3. To implement strategies to reduce stress and distress20,34
    4. To enhance existing coping strategies20,34
    5. To foster effective communication20,34
    6. To promote independence20,34
    7. To develop a staying well plan20,34
    8. To reduce HEE33
    9. To prevent psychotic relapse.33

  • It consists of:
    1. an education session20,34

    2. problem-solving sessions using CBT20,34
    3. sessions concentrating on practical ways of dealing with emotion.20,34

  • The programmes contain elements of stress management, communication skills, problem-solving and goal achievement and improve knowledge about schizophrenia and the early warning signs20,34
  • Results:
    1. An increase in the understanding of the illnesses38

    2. Decreased family tension and stress20,34
    3. Decreased burden20,34
    4. Decreased EOI33
    5. Decreased rates of relapse and hospitalisation3,38
    6. Improved medication adherence.38

Barriers to implementing these interventions in practice are time, funding and the availability of supervision.20 Just because the likelihood of local government and mental health care services being able to create enough resources to implement these interventions and programmes is not that realistic does not mean that mental health care professionals in this country are unable to help families of patients with schizophrenia. Most existing mental health care facilities have resources to supply educational interventions. Brief educational intervention in the setting of a consultation can greatly reduce subjective burden in family members of mentally ill patients.6 A feeling of support from mental health care services can be created within caregivers of mentally ill patients by using simple phrases of encouragement such as ’hang in there’, ‘never give up’ and ‘take it one day at a time’.19 Furthermore, giving comparatively insignificant pieces of advice can dramatically decrease levels of family burden. For example, in families where there is more than one caregiver, they should take turns in caring for the patient and should make full use of their time away from the patient by maximising time for hobbies and leisure. Advice should be given that they should structure time to just ‘get away from it all’ and ‘let their hair down’.

Conclusion

Families of patients with schizophrenia experience high levels of burden and receive very little information about the illness, how to cope with their mentally ill relative or related matters such as EE. They are subsequently rendered largely ill-equipped to deal with these challenges and problems. By providing more information and resources, and implementing programmes designed to address these problems, families of patients with schizophrenia can experience higher levels of support and empowerment and lower levels of burden. Furthermore, families need to be psycho-educated about the negative effects of patient criticism and intrusive behaviours which increase levels of HEE and EOI, both of which are detrimental to patients and increase relapse rates.

Acknowledgements

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no financial or personal relationships which may have inappropriately influenced him in writing this article.

References

  1. Kate N, Grover S, Kulhara P, Nehra R. Relationship of quality of life with coping and burden in primary caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014;60(2):107–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020764012467598
  2. Margetić BA, Jakovljević M, Furjan Z, Margetić B, Maršanić VB. Quality of life of key caregivers of schizophrenia patients and association with kinship. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2013;21(4):220–223.
  3. Nyström M, Svensson H. Lived experiences of being a father of an adult child with schizophrenia. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004;25:363–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01612840490432907
  4. Hsiao CY, Tsai YF. Caregiver burden and satisfaction in families of individuals with schizophrenia. Nurs Res. 2014;63(4):260–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000047
  5. Shah STH, Sultan SM, Faisal M, Irfan M. Psychological distress among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. J Ayub Med Coll Abbotabad. 2013;25(3–4):27–30.
  6. Stengård E. Educational intervention for the relatives of schizophrenia patients in Finland. Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57:271–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08039480310002093
  7. Duckworth K, Halpern L. Peer support and peer-led family support for persons living with schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27:216–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000051
  8. Chien WT, Norman I. Educational needs of families caring for Chinese patients with schizophrenia. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(5):490–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0309-2402.2003.02832.x
  9. Kate N, Grover S, Kulhara P, Nehra R. Caregiving appraisal in schizophrenia: A study from India. Soc Sci Med. 2013;98:135–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.005
  10. Magliano L, Fiorillo A, De Rosa C, et al. Family burden in long-term diseases: A comparative study in schizophrenia vs. physical disorders. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:313–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.064
  11. Madionos M, Economou M, Dafni O, et al. Family disruption, economic hardship and psychological distress in schizophrenia: Can they be measured? Eur Psychiatry. 2004;19:408–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.06.028
  12. Jagannathan A, Thirthalli J, Hamza A, Nagendra HR, Gangadhar BN. Predictors of family caregiver burden in schizophrenia: Study from an in-patient tertiary care hospital in India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014;8:94–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2013.12.018
  13. Lowyck B, De Hert M, Peeters E, et al. A study of the family burden of 150 family members of schizophrenic patients. Eur Psychiatry. 2004;19:395–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.04.006
  14. Hazel NA, McDonell MG, Short RA, et al. Impact of multiple-family groups for outpatients with schizophrenia on caregivers’ distress and resources. Psychiatr Serv. 2004;55:35–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.1.35
  15. Koukia E, Madianos MG. Is psychosocial rehabilitation of schizophrenic patients preventing family burden? A comparative study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2005;12:415–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2005.00852.x
  16. Jungbauer J, Wittmund B, Dietrich S, Angermeyer MC. Subjective burden over 12 months in parents of patients with schizophrenia. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2003;17(3):126–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9417(03)00056-6
  17. Kate N, Grover S, Kulhara P, Nehra R. Relationship of caregiver burden with coping strategies, social support, psychological morbidity, and quality of life in the caregivers of schizophrenia. Asian J Psychiatr. 2013;6:380–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2013.03.014
  18. Singh PM, Prajapati A. Burden of schizophrenia on caregivers in Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2012;15(2):140–143.
  19. Rudge T, Morse K. Did anything change? Caregivers and schizophrenia after medication changes. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004;11:3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00641.x
  20. Kelly M, Newstead L. Family intervention in routine practice: It is possible! J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004;11:64–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00689.x
  21. Magliano L, Marasco C, Fiorillo A, et al. The impact of professional and social network support on the burden of families of patients with schizophrenia in Italy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106:291–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02223.x
  22. Ferriter M, Huband N. Experiences of parents with a son or daughter suffering from schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2003;10:552–560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2003.00624.x
  23. Roldán-Merino J, García IC, Ramos-Pichardo JD, et al. Impact of personalized in-home nursing care plans on dependence in ADLs/IADLs and on family burden among adults diagnosed with schizophrenia: A randomized controlled study. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2013;49:171–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6163.2012.00347.x
  24. Testart J, Richieri R, Caqueo-Urízar A, et al. Quality of life and other outcome measures in caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconon Outcomes Res. 2013;13(5):641–649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2013.838022
  25. Harvey C, O’Hanlon B. Family psycho-education for people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders and their families. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013;47(6):516–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004867413476754
  26. Boye B. Bentsen H, Malt UF. Does guilt proneness predict acute and long-term distress in relatives of patients with schizophrenia? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106:351–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02276.x
  27. Angermeyer MC, Schulze B, Dietrich S. Courtesy stigma a focus group study of relatives of schizophrenia patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003;38:593–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-003-0680-x
  28. Rammohan A, Rao K, Subbakrishna DK. Religious coping and psychological well-being in carers of relatives with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;105:356–362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1o149.x
  29. Saunders J. ‘At Wits’ End!’: Perspectives of Hispanic caregivers of a family member with schizophrenia. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2013;34:451–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2012.741659
  30. McDonell MG, Short RA, Berry CM, Dyck DG. Burden in schizophrenia caregivers: Impact of family psychoeducation and awareness of patient suicidality. Fam Process. 2003;42:91–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00091.x
  31. Quah S. Caring for persons with schizophrenia at home: Examining the link between family caregivers’ role distress and quality of life. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(4):596–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12091
  32. Greenberg JS, Seltzer MM, Kraus MW, Chou RJ, Hong J. The effect of quality of the relationship between mothers and adult children with schizophrenia, autism, or down syndrome on maternal well-being: The mediating role of optimism. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2004;74(1):14–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.74.1.14
  33. Lenior ME, Dingemans PMAJ, Schene AH, Hart AAM, Linszen DH. The course of parental expressed emotion and psychotic episodes after family intervention in recent-onset schizophrenia. A longitudinal study. Schizophr Res. 2002;57:183–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00305-X
  34. Berglund N, Vahlne JO, Edman Å. Family intervention in schizophrenia Impact on family burden and attitude. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003;38:116–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-003-0615-6
  35. López RS, Nelson Hipke K, Polo AJ, et al. Ethnicity, expressed emotion, attributions, and course of schizophrenia: Family warmth matters. J Abnorm Psychol. 2004;113(3):428–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.428
  36. Sherman MD. The Support and Family Education (SAFE) Program: Mental health facts for families. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54(1):35–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.54.1.35
  37. Chien WT, Lee IFK. Educational needs of families caring for patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11:695–696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00649.x
  38. Chien WT, Thompson DR. An RCT with three-year follow-up of peer support groups for Chinese families of persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64(10):997–1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200243


Submitted: 15 December 2015
Published: 31 August 2016




African Online Scientific Information Systems (Pty) Ltd t/a AOSIS
Reg No: 2002/002017/07
RSA Tel: 086 1000 381
International Tel: +27 21 975 2602
15 Oxford Street, Durbanville, Cape Town, 7550, South Africa
publishing(AT)aosis.co.za replace (AT) with @

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
Website design & content: ©2018 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved. No unauthorised duplication allowed.
By continuing to use this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get specific, domain-collection newsletters detailing the latest CPD courses, scholarly research and call-for-papers in your field.

Subscribe

South African Journal of Psychiatry    |    ISSN: 1608-9685 (PRINT)    |    ISSN: 2078-6786 (ONLINE)